George Dunn posted a lengthy discussion of his version of the facts in the litigation in the NEWS & EVENTS drop down menu on the Registry web site:
I'll quote one sentence and comment on it:
"Dealing with personal lawsuits is a huge burden which no one signed up for."
Steve Heinrichs filed suit, on behalf of himself and on behalf of the members of the Registry, to enforce membership rights on October 1, 2012. The suit is against only a corporation, 356 Registry, Inc. On November 2, 2012, that corporation, which acts solely through its board, including Mr. Dunn, filed a "personal" suit against Mr. Heinrichs, seeking among other things punitive damages. Mr. Heinrichs has no corporate shield behind which to hide - that suit filed at the instigation of Mr. Dunn and his fellow board of trustee members is most certainly personal. Apparently Mr. Dunn feels that a member of the Registry DID sign up for dealing with a "personal" lawsuit.
Mr. Heinrichs's lawsuit against the corporation is about policy matters. The corporation's suit against Mr. Heinrichs is most assuredly personal.
Mr. Heinrichs's recently filed lawsuit in federal court against the individual trustees/officers IS most assuredly personal also. Although Mr. Heinrichs is spending his own money and the corporation, officers and trustees are spending other people's money, the parties are, as of a couple weeks ago, on equal footing regarding "personal" lawsuits.
Mr. Dunn, although stating claimed facts that are disputed by Mr. Heinrichs, states absolutely nothing about the corporation's suit against Mr. Heinrichs. It is about time he does so, or, actually preferably to me, quits complaining about the "personal" lawsuits which originated with him. Having assumed the role of the bully, it is too late for Mr. Dunn to back out when the victim fights back.
May the best man/woman win.
Bill
I'll quote one sentence and comment on it:
"Dealing with personal lawsuits is a huge burden which no one signed up for."
Steve Heinrichs filed suit, on behalf of himself and on behalf of the members of the Registry, to enforce membership rights on October 1, 2012. The suit is against only a corporation, 356 Registry, Inc. On November 2, 2012, that corporation, which acts solely through its board, including Mr. Dunn, filed a "personal" suit against Mr. Heinrichs, seeking among other things punitive damages. Mr. Heinrichs has no corporate shield behind which to hide - that suit filed at the instigation of Mr. Dunn and his fellow board of trustee members is most certainly personal. Apparently Mr. Dunn feels that a member of the Registry DID sign up for dealing with a "personal" lawsuit.
Mr. Heinrichs's lawsuit against the corporation is about policy matters. The corporation's suit against Mr. Heinrichs is most assuredly personal.
Mr. Heinrichs's recently filed lawsuit in federal court against the individual trustees/officers IS most assuredly personal also. Although Mr. Heinrichs is spending his own money and the corporation, officers and trustees are spending other people's money, the parties are, as of a couple weeks ago, on equal footing regarding "personal" lawsuits.
Mr. Dunn, although stating claimed facts that are disputed by Mr. Heinrichs, states absolutely nothing about the corporation's suit against Mr. Heinrichs. It is about time he does so, or, actually preferably to me, quits complaining about the "personal" lawsuits which originated with him. Having assumed the role of the bully, it is too late for Mr. Dunn to back out when the victim fights back.
May the best man/woman win.
Bill
Comment